|
Deans’
Council Minutes
September 7, 2004
First-Year
Student Advocate
– Deans discussed prospective nominees for the recognition
by the U of South Carolina under their Freshman Year Experience.
Speaker
of House Intern – Deans identified two students
who might be nominated. Dean Webber will inquire as to their interest.
Management
of Metroplex – Discussion focused on how to ensure
strong academic presence at Mesquite; Deans Ashley and Headley
will visit on a regular basis and Dean Langford teaches there.
Scheduling
events for Homecoming – Deans expressed interest
in scheduling receptions and other functions and sought clarification
about times available for collegiate/departmental events.
Fire
Safety – The Provost reviewed major points in the
Fire Marshal’s review, including adequate egress from the
MSC cafeteria and the lack of fire alarms in the Journalism building.
Institutional
process for recycling old computers – M. Hendrix
reviewed the process for academic and student affairs.
Graduate
School Recruitment Fund – Dean Headley proposed
and the deans supported an incentive fund from the Graduate School
to assist departments in recruiting efforts.
Graduate
Program Review – Dean Headley suggested a “neutral”
committee to review department reports and make recommendations;
deans concurred. Another question was raised about how much of
a department should be reviewed—one program at a time or
the whole department? This question will be studied during the
year as we conduct two reviews—Counseling and Literature
and Languages.
Post
tenure review report from System – The Provost
shared the A&M System report on post-tenure reviews which
showed 120 faculty reviewed with no negative reports at Commerce.
University
Studies Review & Capstone courses – The University
Studies review for THECB has been completed and sent to the A&M
System staff. Dean Doughty asked about the Capstone courses and
what was their purpose presently? The question was raised whether
Capstones were fulfilling the purpose originally ascribed.
Transfer
Students at Commerce – The Provost distributed the summary
of transfer activity among Commerce graduates for the past four
years, showing only 10-12 percent of graduates are “native”
(started and finished at Commerce) while 90 percent carry some
transfer credit and the majority have more than 45 hours of transfer
credit. Questions about implications for Core and Capstone courses
need further discussion.
Turnitin
software to detect plagiarism – information about
this product will be referred to the Academic Affairs Technology
Committee for a recommendation about whether the university should
acquire it.
Morris K. Udall Foundation Scholarship –
Deans recommended a faculty member to be liaison.
Academic
Advising & Texas Success Initiative – Mary
Hendrix will call a meeting with Deans, Academic Advisors, Wendy
Gruver, and Paige Bussell to discuss implementation of new processes
for academic advising and the Texas Success Initiative. Our goal
is to improve retention rates and students’ academic success.
National
Evaluation System Test Site – Wendy Gruver has
worked with National Evaluation System for the university to be
designated as a computerized testing site for TExES. We should
receive the contract next week and hope to improve our service
to students and area school districts by being able to administer
the test and receive instant results. Once the contract has been
approved, a notice will be sent to the listserv explaining the
details.
Navarro,
Mesquite & UCD Updates – Mary Hendrix reported
Unofficial enrollment numbers are: Navarro-688 (up from 412 in
fall 2003); Mesquite-2474; UCD-422; Other-458
Online
Course Enrollments – Mary Hendrix reported Unofficial
enrollment is 1648 (up from 835 in fall 2003)
Re-classifying
GANT, GAT, & GARs – Dean Doughty asked about
the process for reclassifying students. Dean Headley asked for
a little more time to study the matter, and Dean Ashley distributed
guidelines in use at College Station. The Provost will bring the
matter up for the President’s Advisory Council and see if
we can reach decisions and take action by October 1.
Confidential & Sensitive Information Survey –
Vice President Terry Pankratz & CTIS Director Mike Cagle reported
that CTIS will be subject to an audit this year and want to ensure
that departments are handling data securely or, if not, have time
to make changes before the audit. CTIS will send a survey with
explanatory memo to the deans for distribution to their directors
and heads. Response time will be relatively short.
|